Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor of one year and six months and fine of two hundred thousand won.

The defendant does not pay the above fine.

Punishment of the crime

【Criminal Force” On January 29, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to one year of imprisonment with prison labor for interference with business in the order of the Gwangju District Court, and on September 30, 2016, the period of parole passed on November 19, 2016, when the sentence was executed in the Net Prison.

【Criminal facts】 The Defendant of the 2016 High Order 2677, Nov. 6, 2016, 2016, on the ground that he/she had sexual intercourse with D while drinking in singing rooms located in Macheon-si B around 1, 2016, on the ground that he/she was said in this manner.

pper said that it can be said that he can not be seen as a single food, and that he can be seen as a dangerous object in the table, and when he can be seen as a flab, flab, and flab, flab, flab, and flab, flab on the part of the shoulder victim, flab, and flab on the part of the treatment days.

Accordingly, the defendant carried dangerous objects and inflicted an injury on the victim.

"2017 Highest 774"

1. The Defendant in violation of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act, from February 19, 2017 to February 21:35, 2017, demanded the police officers working without any reason while under the influence of alcohol at the Macheon Police Station G police box located in Macheon-si to 21:55 of the same day to “accompon a coffee,” and was rejected, “Accompon. I will put frane on one stop. I will have more power than flap, flap and flap.

The Defendant spits spite on the floor of the office, which is a large flusium called flusent flusium, and thereby, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol, thereby committing an act of revocation at the public office.

2. On February 19, 2017, the Defendant was arrested as a flagrant offender under the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act at the above location around 22:05 on February 19, 2017, and the Defendant was arrested as a flagrant offender under the same violation of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act, the Defendant’s interference with the performance of official duties was discarded down “

If the prison went to prison, it would have a knife with a knife.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the arrest of police officers in the act of committing a crime.

Summary of Evidence

"2016 Highest 2677"

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. E.