The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.

Punishment of the crime

From April 2011, the Defendant was living together in the D Hospital's room located in the Gyeongnam-gun, Gyeongnam-gun, Gyeongnam-gun, and became a de facto marital relationship. On February 2012, the relationship was terminated.

On May 22, 2012, the Defendant: (a) laid off the NAF Card (F) from the franchisium B, which was discharged from the clothes of the D Hospital room in the Gyeongnam-gun, Busan-gun; (b) then, (c) entered the said franchisty card in the cash payment period for the franchisium located in the same franchisium located in the same franchisium, the Defendant then transferred the 10 million won in total to the franchis account (G) of the Defendant’s agricultural bank account in the same franchisium located in the same franchisium, around 09:06.

Accordingly, the defendant acquired the property benefits of the amount by inputting the information without authority into the data processor, such as computer, etc.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The protocol of statement concerning B and the application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the suspect examination protocol;

1. Relevant Article 347-2 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and the choice of punishment;

1. Penalty fine of KRW 1,000,000 to be suspended;

1. Articles 70 and 69(2) of the Criminal Act (50,000 won per day) of the Criminal Act for the inducement of a workhouse;

1. Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act (Article 59(1) of the suspended sentence (Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act is an initial crime with no criminal history, and there is room for normal reference in the motive of the crime. Under the legal doctrine, the victim is a financial institution which is a direct party to the transaction of money transfer and is a principle of double payment risk, but it appears that there is a reason to think that the defendant has monetary claim against B, and since