1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The deceased B (hereinafter referred to as "the deceased") entered the Army on January 24, 1953. On April 15, 1954, the deceased after being diagnosed as Trocma at the Army Hospital on April 15, 1954, and was discharged from military service on May 16, 1954.

The name of the deceased, the water day, symptoms, etc. recorded in the beds of the Army Hospital shall be as follows, and the death day of the deceased on the date of removal from the register shall be December 7, 1956.

- - The name of the medical unit : D (Japanese) - The name of the medical unit - The name of the 36th Army Hospital - the name of the disease: Trocoma (Sacoma, April 15, 1954): Kim Sea - The date of receiving the award: July 10, 1953 - the date of discharge: the first medical examination and hospitalization: the date of April 15, 1954 - the date of discharge: the date of May 25, 1954 - the day of the first medical examination - the day of the first medical examination - the day of the first medical examination - the day of the first medical examination - the day of the first medical examination - the day of the first medical examination - the day of the first medical examination - the disease - the day of the first medical examination - one month after the after the injury was discharged from the inner part of June 1953, but the symptoms of the second medical examination - the symptoms of the second medical examination -

B. On February 12, 2014, the Plaintiff, a deceased’s son, made an application for registration of a person of distinguished service to the Defendant on the ground that the deceased sustained an injury during the Korean War, and the Board of Patriots and Veterans Entitlement, on June 16, 2014, decided that the deceased did not meet the requirements for persons of distinguished service to the State under the Act on the Honorable Treatment of and Support for Persons, etc. of Distinguished Service to the State (hereinafter “the Act”) on the ground that “the deceased could not verify whether the deceased participated in the 625 War on active duty,” and that there is no objective evidence proving that the deceased suffered an injury or brain injury during combat action or during the performance of duties corresponding thereto (hereinafter “instant application”). On June 25, 2014, the Defendant notified the Plaintiff of the determination corresponding to the expenses of persons of distinguished service to the deceased (hereinafter “previous decision”).

C. The Plaintiff filed a lawsuit against the Defendant seeking revocation of the previous decision of this case (hereinafter “instant lawsuit”) and filed it with the Seoul Administrative Court of the first instance.