A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On February 14, 2018, the Defendant paid taxi expenses and returned home from E, a police officer who was called up after receiving a 112 report from a taxi engineer that a drunk customer does not get off from a taxi at the time of the Government of the Gyeonggi-do on February 14, 2018.

In order to hear the word “,” I am off from A self-si, I am saw “the same year and weather year of this dog” to the above E, and assaulted the head of the female on a hand, fluencing his head on a single occasion, walking the bridge on a hand, walking the bridge on a hand.

Accordingly, the Defendant, who is a police official, interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the reporting processing of E- 112.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the F Statements;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. As to the Defendant’s assertion on Article 62(1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2009Da14448, Apr. 1, 2009) of the Criminal Act, the Defendant alleged that he was in a state of mental or physical loss or mental weakness under the influence of alcohol at the time of committing the instant crime. As such, according to the evidence adopted and examined by the court, the Defendant appears to have been in a state of drinking alcohol at the time of committing the instant crime, but it cannot be deemed that the Defendant did not have the ability