logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2018.06.20 2018누40616
체류기간연장등불허가처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited by the court of first instance is as follows, with the exception that the court of first instance amends “Woo Da Da Da” under the 5th and below the 3th of the 5th instance judgment from the 5th to the 3th below, and therefore, it is identical to the ground of the judgment of the court of first instance (this court’s assertion is not significantly different from the argument of the court of first instance). Thus, it is acceptable as it is in accordance with

"However, the plaintiff was the first day of pleading in this Court that the plaintiff did not undergo health examinations at the hospital affiliated with the medical foundation, unlike the explanation at the time of the initial application for status of stay after entry."

2. Conclusion, the first instance judgment is justifiable.

The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

arrow