(영문) 전주지방법원 2017.07.18 2017고정339

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 전주지방법원 2017.07.18 2017고정339

도로교통법위반(음주운전)

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 500,000.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who drives a motor vehicle by borrowing C.

On February 25, 2017, the Defendant driven the said vehicle at approximately 20 meters from the front side of the E elementary school located in Sogjin-gu, Sogjin-gu, Seoul, under the influence of alcohol concentration of 0.070% among the blood transfusions around 23:00 to the front side of the F apartment after the front side of the Gu.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A report on the detection of a primary driver;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to notify the results of regulating drinking driving;

1. Relevant Article of the Act and Articles 148-2 (2) 3 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, the selection of fines concerning facts constituting an offense, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Reasons for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act in the order of provisional payment are as follows: (a) the reason why the defendant was allowed to drive the pertinent drinking; (b) the substitute driver set up at the entrance of the apartment parking lot where the defendant living the defendant's car at the expense of the fee between the substitute driver and the substitute driver; (c) the purpose is to remove the situation where the substitute driver was likely to obstruct other residents' access to the parking lot; and (d) the distance of the defendant's driving was limited to about 20 meters from the inside of the apartment parking lot of the defendant at the place where the substitute driver parked as above; (b) the defendant's driving regulation by drinking of the instant case seems to be due to the information of the defendant and the substitute driver's driver's driver's agent who was punished for the fee; and (c) the defendant's age and occupation and living environment at the time of

참조조문

-형법 제69조 제2항

-형법 제70조 제1항

유사 판례

-광주지방법원 2017.10.19 2017고정1301

-의정부지방법원 2018.05.01 2018고단519

-전주지방법원 2017.06.20 2017고단601

-대전지방법원 홍성지원 2017.08.31 2017고정19

-전주지방법원 정읍지원 2018.10.02 2018고정73