The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The main point of the grounds for appeal is that the lower court’s imprisonment (one year and two months of imprisonment, and additional collection) is too unreasonable.

2. The fact that the Defendant’s judgment reflects the instant crime and does not repeat the crime, and that it appears that the Defendant’s actual profit is not significant, is favorable to the Defendant.

On the other hand, the following is disadvantageous.

The crime of this case was established for the purpose of profit-making, and the crime of this case was committed by impeding the citizens' desire to work in good faith and encouraging speculative spirit so that the crime of this case is not less complicated.

The Defendant, as a prompt term "warehouse" in charge of the installation and operation of a gambling place, performed a key role, such as crossing the place.

The defendant committed several crimes by changing the recruiters for a long time, moving the place, and the scale of gambling by each crime is very large.

The defendant has been punished twice as a crime of gambling and one time as a crime of gambling.

In addition, in full view of the circumstances leading up to the instant crime, circumstances after the instant crime, Defendant’s age, character and conduct, and environment, etc., even if considering the circumstances favorable to Defendant, it is not recognized that the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable as it is too unreasonable, and thus, the Defendant’s assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.