logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원순천지원 2020.08.13 2018가합12972
종중총회결의부존재확인
Text

1. The plaintiff's main claim is dismissed.

2. Each resolution entered in the Defendant’s separate sheet is invalid.

3...

Reasons

1. The “C” of the basic facts is the title E (F) among the 17th hand hand of Dpha Dpha 17.

The south of E is G (S) and there are I (S), K, K, L, M, N,O, P, Q, Q, R, T, U (V), W, X, and Y as G's children.

The plaintiff is a child of I.

On September 18, 1919, the ownership transfer registration was completed on September 18, 1919 with respect to the Z, 908 (hereinafter “the instant real estate”), and on March 27, 194, the ownership transfer registration was completed in the AB type B (hereinafter “AB type”).

Since then, the registration of ownership transfer was completed on March 27, 194 in the course of the computerized transfer of the certified copy of the register of the real estate of this case to the B-type AA (hereinafter “B-type”).

Q, M, N, S, Y, W, U, and R held the Defendant’s clan general meeting on October 20, 2016 and made a resolution on the approval of the Defendant’s clan rules, the management and disposition of fundamental property (hereinafter “the first resolution”).

The above clan rules state that "the members of the clan shall be the descendants of the clan 17 years old (one member)."

W, U, R, N, and S decided to hold a defendant's clan general meeting on October 9, 2017 and appoint W as W. A resolution was made to implement the registration of change of the name of registration to correct the registration number for real estate registration, the additional registration number for real estate registration, the name of the office address and the name of the representative (hereinafter referred to as "the second resolution").

The registration of change of indication was completed by changing the name of the representative of the Class B in document on the real estate in this case according to the application for change of indication of W registered titleholder based on the second resolution.

Before the first and second resolutions, I did not notify the children and some members of I including the plaintiff, and the notification of convening a clan general meeting was given to G only one member of G.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 3 through 7, 9, 11, 12, 16 (including each number; hereinafter the same shall apply) and arguments.

arrow