1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On May 16, 2010, when the Plaintiff was working for a bus bus, the Plaintiff obtained medical care approval from the Defendant regarding the “emulative escape certificate No. 12-Tife No. 12-Tife No. 12-Tife No. 12-Tife No. 2-3 (hereinafter “the instant accident”) from May 16, 201 to July 31, 201,” which was caused by the shock of the instant accident after cleaning the floor of the tea from the bus pentle on May 16, 2010 (hereinafter “instant accident”).

B. On August 30, 201, after the completion of medical care, the Plaintiff filed a claim for compensation for disability with the Defendant, and received class 10 of disability grade 14 as “a person who remains with a national father of the national father”.

C. On November 28, 2012, the Plaintiff filed an application for additional medical care on the basis of the doctor’s opinion that the symptoms worsen to the Defendant and that an operational treatment is needed.

On May 18, 2010 and October 22, 2012, the Defendant issued a disposition not to grant additional medical care (hereinafter “instant disposition”) against the Plaintiff on December 5, 2012 on the ground that the Plaintiff did not seem to have any particular aggravation of symptoms in comparison with the RoI taken on May 18, 2010, and that the return to work after the completion of the medical care and the outcome of aggravation of symptoms cannot be seen as having been given.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 3, Eul evidence Nos. 1 and 2, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

가. 원고의 주장 원고는 2012. 10. 17.경 버스 운행 중 지하철 공사 구간을 지나다가 차량이 덜컹거려 허리에 심한 충격을 받은 후 증상이 악화되어 수술이 필요한 상태로 변화였으므로, 이는 증상악화로 인한 재요양 요건에 해당된다.

Under a different premise, the Defendant’s disposition of this case is unlawful.

(b) Article 51 (Additional Medical Care) (1) of the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Act (the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Act) provides that a person who received medical care benefits pursuant to Article 40 of the same Act shall be entitled to medical care shall be more than the time of