1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff, including those resulting from participation.

1. The grounds alleged by the plaintiff in the court of first instance while filing an appeal are not significantly different from the contents alleged by the court of first instance, and the judgment of the court of first instance dismissing the plaintiff's claim even if the evidence submitted by the court of first instance and the court of first instance are re-examineed along with the plaintiff's assertion

Therefore, this court's reasoning is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance except for dismissal or addition as follows. Thus, this court shall accept it in accordance with Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

The main text of the judgment of the court of first instance seems to refer to “2) Z(2) Z(see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision No. 2019, Apr. 22, 2019). The main text of the judgment of the court of first instance is as follows: “The Plaintiff’s grounds of appeal No. 21, 2019.”

6.On the 6th 20th m “L” is cut back with “L, M, etc.” and add “On the other hand, I have manufactured the Z, one of the equipment constituting theO in itself.”

7. Each "this Court" in 9. 9. 14, 15, 11. 5, 12. 4, and 14.

12 Myeon 18 and 19 shall read " Eul evidence Nos. 7, 4, 5, 7, 10, 12, 16, and 18" as " Eul evidence Nos. 7, 8, 3, 4, 5, 7, 9, 10, 12, 16, 17, 18, 22."

14. On January 15, 2018, the 14th 3th 5th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 5th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7

"ro, 6 to 14 parallels are as follows:

5. On the other hand, the defendant and the participating administrative agency asserted that they were unable to perform the contract of this case by refusing to provide technical assistance to the plaintiff and thus cancel the contract of this case.