(영문) 수원지방법원 평택지원 2014.10.22 2014고합63

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 수원지방법원 평택지원 2014.10.22 2014고합63

성폭력범죄의처벌등에관한특례법위반(13세미만미성년자강간)

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for five years.

The defendant shall be ordered to complete 200 hours of sexual assault treatment program.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

At around 22:00 to 24:00 on January 2013, the Defendant: (a) had the Defendant’s residence, ambling croud 201; (b) had the Defendant drinked to rape the victim D (the victim’s 12 years old), who is a married son, who was able to sleep on the part of the Defendant; (c) had the victim’s her left hand taken the bridge by putting the victim’s her two legs into the her left hand; (d) had the victim her seated with the victim’s her seat and her panty; and (e) had the victim her knee, her so as to prevent the victim from leaving the her her seat by placing the knee of the victim’s head; and (e) had the victim her kick by inserting the victim’s her head into the part of the Defendant’s panty; and (e) had the victim her shouldered the victim’s her part of the Defendant’s body.

Summary of Evidence

1. A witness E clinical psychologist qualification certificate is a statement analysis expert.

Statements made in this Court

1. The third protocol of trial is a counselor belonging to a specialized child protection agency in the Daejeon Daejeon Metropolitan City;

statement

1. Statement of the suspect examination of the accused prepared by the public prosecutor;

1. Statement made by the police officer on the victim's statement;

1. Entry of stenographic records in the statement of a victim in the preparation of the G;

1. Determination as to the defendant and defense counsel's assertion on each of the investigation reports (the details of the consultation date / the confirmation of the transfer address of the victim / the counseling date of the Daejeon Child Protection Agency / the counseling date of the Daejeon Child Protection Agency / Opinions of participating experts / The submission of the evaluation report to participating experts on the victim) prepared by the police officer

1. The summary of the argument is that the defendant has no raped the victim as stated in the judgment.

2. Determination:

(a) the court.

유사 판례

-광주지방법원 목포지원 2019.03.28 2019고합11

-수원지방법원 2018.01.10 2017노6462

-대구지방법원 경주지원 2014.12.22 2014고합76

-서울남부지방법원 2014.05.16 2013고합522

-서울중앙지방법원 2016.06.24 2016고합438