beta
Text
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 6,000,000.
When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On May 19, 2008, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of KRW 2.5 million for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) in the Goyang Branch of the Jung-gu District Court on May 19, 2008. On February 3, 2009, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of KRW 3 million for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) in the Goyang Branch of the Jung-gu District Court.
On March 13, 2014, around 22:43, the Defendant driven a bppon car in the state of alcohol alcohol concentration of approximately 200 meters from the section of approximately 200 meters, from the 1st apartment of the SK Review to the road of the same road located in the same Gu, the Defendant driven a bpon car in the state of under the influence of alcohol content of 0.136%.
Accordingly, the Defendant, who violated the prohibition of driving under the influence of alcohol not less than twice, was driving a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol again.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. Report on the results of the crackdown on drinking driving, and report on the situation of driving under drinking;
1. Previous records: The application of criminal records, inquiry and other Acts and subordinate statutes;
1. Relevant Article of the Act on Criminal Facts, Articles 148-2 (1) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, the selection of fines for the crime, and the selection of fines;
1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;
1. Although the crime of this case was committed even though the reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order had already been punished two times or more due to drinking driving, it is very important to commit the crime of this case. However, the blood alcohol concentration of this case is very high, and the previous conviction of this case was around 2008 and around 2009, it is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds above all the circumstances.