The appeal is dismissed.

The grounds of appeal are examined.

In light of relevant legal principles and evidence, the lower court’s judgment convicting the Defendant of the modified charges of this case on the grounds stated in its reasoning did not err by misapprehending the facts against logical and empirical rules or by failing to exhaust all necessary deliberations as to whether or not the Defendant’s mental and physical disorder, as alleged in

Meanwhile, pursuant to Article 383 subparag. 4 of the Criminal Procedure Act, only in cases where death penalty, life imprisonment, or imprisonment with or without prison labor for more than ten years is imposed, an appeal may be filed on the grounds of unfair sentencing. As such, the argument that the Defendant’s punishment is unfair because it is too minor for the Defendant to be imposed is not a legitimate ground for appeal.

In addition, the defendant's remaining assertion as to the injury of the victim E on May 19, 2016, not the facts charged in the instant case, is not a legitimate ground for appeal.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.