1. The Defendants jointly share KRW 246,689,117 with respect to the Plaintiff and the period from October 8, 2016 to December 8, 2016.

1. Presumed facts

A. The Plaintiff is a juristic person entrusted with the industrial accident compensation insurance business under the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Act (hereinafter “Industrial Accident Insurance Act”), and the Defendant A is the driver and owner of the Defendant’s vehicle B (hereinafter “Defendant’s vehicle”), and the Defendant Hyundai Marine Fire Insurance Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Company”) is the insurer who entered into a comprehensive automobile insurance contract with the Defendant’s vehicle.

B. At around 11:40 on April 15, 2010, Defendant A neglected his/her duty of care on the right side of the Defendant’s vehicle while driving the Defendant vehicle at the D factory factory hole located in Geumnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, and neglected his/her duty of care on the right side of the front side while driving the Defendant vehicle into the right side of the front side, Defendant A received E (hereinafter “victim”) who was a D affiliated employee on the left side of the Defendant’s vehicle and served on the right side of the victim’s right side.

(hereinafter referred to as the “instant accident”). The victims of the instant accident have suffered injuries, such as the upper right side of the bridge opened, the upper right thalle of the pelvis salle of the pelvis salle of the pelvis salle, the right pelle of the pelvis salle of the pelvis salle of the complex, and the two-type right side of the complex department, and have been treated until now at the Hanam University Hospital, the Hanyang-gu subsidiary hospital of the Hanyangyang-gu, the Ficle Hospital,

C. After the instant accident, the Plaintiff paid KRW 99,456,160 of temporary layoff benefits to the victim, medical care benefits of KRW 169,830,150, and disability benefits of KRW 89,154,130.

[Ground of recognition] The fact that there has been no dispute, Gap's 1 through 5, 7 through 14, and Eul's 2 (including each number, if any; hereinafter the same shall apply), the purport of the whole pleadings and arguments

2. According to the facts of recognition of the liability for damages and the occurrence of the right to indemnity, Defendant A, the driver of the Defendant vehicle, has been negligent by neglecting his duty of care, despite the existence of the occupational duty of care to prevent the accident due to driving on the front left left and right by safe means, and thereby, the victim was injured.