The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence of 8,00,000 won imposed by the court below on the summary of the grounds of appeal is too unfasible and unreasonable.

2. The judgment is based on the records that the defendant had been punished twice for the same kind of drinking driving, and the defendant committed each of the crimes of this case without being well aware of even during the repeated period. Each of the crimes of this case is found to have been committed by the defendant while driving a car in the state of 0.183% alcohol concentration and sustained injury to four victims and has damaged the victim C's vehicle and escaped without being damaged, and the quality of the crime is not good. However, even though it is recognized that the defendant's mistake is not good, the defendant's depth is against the victim's mistake and again did not commit the above crime, the degree of damage was agreed with the victims and the victim's degree is not significant, the vehicle of the defendant was covered by comprehensive insurance, and the vehicle repair cost was paid through it, and the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, the result of the crime, the circumstance before and after the crime, etc., of Article 51 of the Criminal Act, the prosecutor's assertion that the above judgment below is too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.