beta
Text
The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.
Reasons
1. In full view of the evidence presented by the prosecutor in the summary of the grounds for appeal, the court below acquitted all the facts charged of this case. The court below erred by misapprehending the facts contrary to the rules of evidence and thereby affecting the conclusion of the judgment.
2. Determination
A. The summary of the facts charged in the instant case is the person operating D Co., Ltd. with the location of 425 of the Gu C Building during Ansan-si.
1) On March 30, 201, at around 21:26, the Defendant: (a) discovered a Flus car parked by the victim E, a resident, at the second floor parking lot of the building C, who was parked as a parking problem; (b) opened a string of the front string of the front string of the front string of the front string of the front string and the rear string of the driver’s string of the vehicle in possession. Accordingly, the Defendant damaged the victim E’s front string of the front string of the string car owned by the victim E to have a repair cost of KRW 694,00,000. (b) On May 2, 2011, the Defendant filed a complaint with the public service center having no knowledge of the name at the public service center during the safe police station.
The content of the written complaint was that “A, despite the absence of the fact that the complainant damaged the FOsp car owned by the Defendant E, the Defendant E, the Defendant E reported the damage of the Osp car caused by the Gu C Building Parking Lot on March 30, 2011 to the police for the purpose of criminal punishment by designating the complainant as the offender and attaching a leaflet to the effect that the complainant was designated as the offender at the above parking lot.”
However, the fact that the defendant returned to the Republic of Korea on March 30, 201, when he had been suffering from the religion of E as a problem of parking, he found the above E vehicle and damaged the wheels and the wheeler in the same manner as that of paragraph 1.
In this respect, the Defendant had the above E.