Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for six months, and by a fine of three million won.

Defendant

B does not pay the above fine.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A The same year from April 2, 2014 to the same year

4. Until June 16, Dobong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Officetel 527 and 1227 "D" operated commercial sex acts establishments, and Defendant B served as the head of office at the above establishments.

During the above period, the Defendants employed a female of sexual traffic, such as E, under the condition that he pays 90,000 won from the 140,000 won for each sexual traffic case, and had the above E perform sexual intercourse with a male guest in his name and sexual intercourse in 1227 around April 16, 2014. The Defendants advertised the above business at the Internet site called "Kakao rice," and advertised the above business at the Internet site of "Kakao," and let the female to conduct sexual traffic, and received the payment for the consideration.

Accordingly, the Defendants conspired to commit acts such as arranging sexual traffic for business purposes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of suspects of E;

1. A report on internal investigation (Attachment of field photographs);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police seizure records;

1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, Article 30 of the Criminal Act and the selection of fines, respectively, in all of the relevant Articles of the Acts and the choice of punishment

1. Articles 70 and 69(2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Defendant A);

1. (Defendant B) Article 25 of the Act on the Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic;

1. Additional collection (Defendant A) Article 25 of the Act on the Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic;

1. The sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act (the defendants) is the first offender, and the defendants are contradictory to the sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, and all other circumstances, including the degree of participation by the defendants, age of the defendants, character and conduct, family relation, motive, means and consequence of the crime, etc., shall be sentenced to the same sentence as the order.