beta
Text
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Details of the disposition;
A. The Plaintiff is a company registered as a cultural heritage repair business entity on March 8, 2013 pursuant to Article 14 of the Act on the Maintenance, etc. of Cultural Heritage (hereinafter “Cultural Heritage Act”).
B. On October 10, 2014, B, the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff’s representative director, was sentenced to the judgment of conviction for the following facts constituting the crime in the Cheongju District Court case No. 2014Ma371, Cheongju District Court Decision No. 2014, Oct. 18, 2014.
▣ 원고의 대표이사 B에 대한 범죄사실(일부) 종합문화재수리업자는 ① 상시 근로하는 문화재수리기술자 4명, 문화재수리기능자 6명 이상을 보유하여야 하는 것을 등록요건으로 하며, 거짓 또는 그 밖의 부정한 방법으로 등록을 하여서는 아니 되고 ② 문화재수리현장에 해당 문화재수리기술자 1명 이상을 배치하여야 하며, ③ 문화재수리업자는 다른 사람에게 자기의 성명 또는 상호를 사용하여 문화재수리를 시행하게 하여서는 아니 된다.
1. From January 2, 2013 to February 2, 2013, the Plaintiff’s representative director B lent the C’s license as cultural heritage technician, KRW 25,00,000 per annum, KRW 20,000 per annum, KRW 10,000 per annum, and KRW 10,000 per annum, E and F’s respective license as cultural heritage repair engineer, and KRW 10,00,00 per annum, and was leased on condition that he and she subscribe to four major insurance, respectively.
Therefore, as seen above, B obtained the qualification certificate of cultural heritage repair engineers and cultural heritage repair technicians, and therefore, B did not have four cultural heritage repair engineers and six cultural heritage repair technicians.
Nevertheless, B is presumed to have ten cultural heritage repair engineers and repair technicians at all times, and B is the list and lease of the cultural heritage repair engineers, etc. to the Chungcheongbuk-do around March 2013.