logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.08.25 2014가단208291
구상금
Text

1. Defendant Young-gu Co., Ltd., and Defendant C jointly and severally with the Plaintiff KRW 350,892,039, and the aforementioned amount on April 22, 2010.

Reasons

1. Determination on the cause of the claim

A. The Plaintiff’s ground of claim and the changed ground of claim are as stated in the annexed sheet.

B. Determination 1) The part of the Plaintiff’s claim against the Defendants above against the Defendant, as to the Defendant’s claim against the Defendant, is deemed to have been led to the confession by the said Defendant on the ground that it was not clearly disputed between the Plaintiff and the Defendant C, and the Plaintiff and the Defendant Young-gu Co., Ltd., based on the overall purport of the entries and arguments among the Plaintiff and the Defendant Young-gu Co., Ltd., the entirety of the arguments and arguments can be acknowledged. 2) The facts that Defendant A, Defendant B, and the Plaintiff against the remaining Defendants jointly and severally guaranteed the Defendant Young-gu Co., Ltd.’s obligation for reimbursement against the Plaintiff of this case against the Defendant Young-gu Industry are insufficient to recognize them

2. The conclusion is that, the defendant, defendant C, jointly and severally, has a duty to jointly and severally pay to the plaintiff KRW 350,892,039 as well as 19% per annum from April 22, 2010 to December 31, 2010, the following day after the payment of insurance money, and the delivery day after the copy of the complaint of this case from the following day to December 31, 2010, and the defendant, the defendant, Co., Ltd., Ltd., is liable to pay the agreed damages for delay calculated at the rate of 15% per annum from January 22, 2015, and the damages for delay calculated at the rate of 20% per annum from November 20, 2014 under the Act on Special Cases concerning the Promotion, etc. of Legal Proceedings from the next day to the day after full payment is made. Thus, the plaintiff's claim against the above Defendants is justified, and the remaining claims against

arrow