logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 여주지원 2012.12.26 2012고단938
간통
Text

Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, as to the Defendants for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A is a person who is a spouse who has completed a marriage report with C on December 30, 2010. A.

On September 2012, 2012, the Defendant, from the office of Echeon-si, Gyeonggi-do, D 206, sent to the Defendant with sexual intercourse B once with B.

B. On September 2012, the Defendant was sent to the B and once sexual intercourse from the house of the Defendant’s house of the B, which was sent to the Defendant.

C. At around 10:00 on October 7, 2012, the Defendant sent to the house above B with sexual intercourse one time with B.

2. Defendant B was aware of the fact that he was a spouse who has reported marriage with C. A.

On September 2012, 2012, the Defendant had sexual intercourses A with the Defendant’s house located in Echeon-si D 206 in Echeon-si, Gyeonggi-do.

B. On September 2012, the suspect was sexual intercourse A with A at the house of the above defendant on September 1, 2012.

C. At around 10:00 on October 7, 2012, the Defendant had sexual intercourse with A one time with the above Defendant’s house.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Statement of the police statement regarding C;

1. A complaint, an additional complaint, and an additional complaint;

1. Certificates of claims for divorce, receipt of certificates, and marriage relationships;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing requests for appraisal;

1. Defendants of relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts: Article 241(1) of the Criminal Act

1. Defendants subject to suspended execution: It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (the first offense committed by all the Defendants, and the provisions of the Criminal Act of this case, even though the Constitutional Court has decided on the constitutionality of the Criminal Act of this case up to now, the view of our society that sees the adultery seems to have been changed

arrow