logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2014.04.18 2014노104
게임산업진흥에관한법률위반등
Text

All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

Reasons

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal that the court below sentenced the defendants (the defendant B shall be sentenced to one year and six months of imprisonment, the defendant D shall be sentenced to imprisonment, the defendant D shall be sentenced to eight months of imprisonment, and the defendant E shall be sentenced to one year of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. Defendant B made a confession of the crime against Defendant B when he committed the crime, and the period of operation of the game of this case is a short-term period. However, the crime of this case was committed in favor of Defendant B by installing 40 game machine and operating the game room, and by exchanging the result obtained by using the game product, which is considerably planned and organized, and there is a need to punish the other Defendants by actively interfering with investigation by allowing them to make a false statement. Further, Defendant B was sentenced on June 30, 201 to imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Game Industry Promotion Act and a crime of aiding and abetting an offender to escape from the crime of this case on June 30, 201 and completed the execution of the sentence, and without being aware of it during the repeated period, again committed the crime of this case without being aware of it during the repeated crime period, and considering the unfavorable circumstances such as the fact that Defendant B’s liability was transferred to Defendant B until the trial court, and other circumstances such as motive and circumstances leading to the crime of this case, the career and circumstances before and circumstances of Defendant B, etc.

B. There are some favorable circumstances for Defendant D, such as the fact that Defendant D is against his mistake and has family members to support, the period of operation of the game room of this case is short time, and the previous convictions and the crime of this case could have been punished concurrently in concurrent crimes under the latter part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act. However, Defendant D may have some favorable conditions for Defendant D on March 30, 201.

arrow