1.(a)

Defendant A and Nonparty H on June 1, 201 with respect to the real estate stated in [Attachment 1] Nos. 1 through (5).

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff’s taxation claim against Nonparty H 1) The director of the North Mine District Tax Office under the Plaintiff’s control has conducted a tax investigation on Nonparty H, who operated the business of selling the recipient, recruiting franchise stores, supplying raw materials, etc. from August 29, 201 to December 31, 201 with the trade name of “I, J, etc.” from 2006, and conducted a tax investigation on Nonparty H from August 29, 201 to December 31, 201. On January 3, 2012, H deemed that it was an actual business operator of each of the above businesses, and thus, imposed value-added tax and global income tax of KRW 719,742,020 (hereinafter “instant tax imposition disposition”), and its claim is referred to as “instant tax claim.”

A. A. Trade Name (Name) Tax Amount of 1.35,349,480 on February 2, 2006 2.35,480,480 on January 8, 2007 207 28,2225,400 I value-added tax (L) on February 50, 2007 90,576,576,90 on January 7, 2009 73,150,3150,310 J. 207, 209, 207, 207, 2016, 307, 207, 209, 306, 207, 204, 197, 197, 205, 206, 204, 306, 206, 316, 2014, 207.

3) On January 3, 2012, H filed a lawsuit to revoke the disposition of revocation of imposition of value-added tax, etc. with the Gwangju District Court, and at the first instance court, the Gwangju District Court rendered a judgment that “the Plaintiff (the Plaintiff of this case) revoke all the disposition of imposition of value-added tax and global income tax stated in the attached Table 1 List against H on January 3, 2012 (Seoul District Court 2013Guhap499). The Plaintiff appealed against this judgment. On July 2, 2015, the Gwangju High Court revoked the said first instance judgment and declared that H’s claim was dismissed (Seoul High Court 2014Nu5179), and on November 12, 2015, H’s appeal became final and conclusive to dismiss the disposition of non-examination (Supreme Court 2015Du48396).

B. Nonparty.