All appeals by the defendant and the prosecutor are dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable for the defendant to be sentenced to the punishment of the lower court (a defendant asserts to the effect that the performance of community service order, etc. is difficult due to the characteristics of the occupation) while the prosecutor appealed by asserting that it is too unhued and unfair.

2. The amount of damage acquired by the accused and the degree of assault are relatively minor.

On the other hand, the Defendant had been punished six times for violent crimes, and 10 times for fraud, and did not recover from damage.

In addition, comprehensively taking into account the sentencing conditions specified in the instant case, such as the Defendant’s age, sex, environment, motive, means and consequence of the commission of the crime, the circumstances after the commission of the crime, etc., the lower court’s punishment is only within the reasonable scope of discretion and is too heavy or light.

It is difficult to see it.

Therefore, we cannot accept all the defendant and prosecutor's argument.

3. In conclusion, since each appeal by the defendant and the prosecutor is without merit, it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.