The appeal is dismissed.

The grounds of appeal are examined.

For reasons indicated in its holding, the lower court determined the Defendant guilty of the part of the facts charged in the instant case and rejected the Defendant’s assertion on mental disability

The judgment below

Examining the reasoning in light of the evidence duly admitted, the lower court did not err in its judgment by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence in violation of logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal doctrine on the establishment of the crime of

In the judgment of the court below, the court below erred in incomplete deliberation on basic facts for sentencing.

The argument that punishment for a repeated crime is unreasonable is ultimately an allegation of unreasonable sentencing.

However, according to Article 383 subparagraph 4 of the Criminal Procedure Act, only in cases where death penalty, life imprisonment, or imprisonment or imprisonment without prison labor for not less than ten years is imposed, an appeal on the grounds of unfair sentencing

In this case where a more minor sentence is imposed on the defendant, the argument that the punishment is too unreasonable is not a legitimate ground for appeal.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.