The defendant shall be innocent.

The Defendant, on December 12, 2016, 15:00 on the charge of the instant facts charged, citing the seat plastic chairs in the bath room located in Asan City B, a male bath located in C, Asan City, into the bath. As such, the Defendant was seated with the seat plastic chairs.

It should not be available if it is used in sugar for the victim D( South, 62 years old).

On the ground that he said that he was 'Woo-man', the victim called 'Woo-man's left side her, 'Woo-man', 'Woo-man', 'Woo-man', 'Woo-man', 'Woo-man', and 'Woo-man', 'Woo-man', 'Woo-man', 'Woo-man' and 'Woo-man', 'Woo-man', 'Woo-man', 'Woo-man', 'Woo-man' and 'Woo-man', 'Woo-man', '

However, the Defendant asserts to the effect that, while intending to recover a plastic victim who had carried with him in a bath at the time, the victim was flicked, the victim’s fingers were flicked, and the victim’s fingers were flicked, and the victim’s fingers were flicked, and there was no criminal intent as stated in the facts charged.

The following circumstances acknowledged by the record, i.e., ① the police officer called at the time of the instant case, as a witness in this court, did not have any doubt in the public bath.

The above statements are inconsistent with the statements of the complainant and are consistent with the contents of the defendant's assertion. ② The police officer at the time does not require the complainant to punish the defendant.

In the case of conclusion processing, but it is generally deemed that the injury is not the degree of violence, the receipt of the case is made regularly regardless of the intention of the parties.

At the time of delivery of a complaint, the complainant made a statement to the effect that he/she did not want to punish a police officer's intent to punish him/her. In light of this, the complainant's wife suffered from the instant case at the time of delivery of the complaint is deemed an injury.