logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2015.09.10 2014구합60665
부당해고구제재심판정취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of the lawsuit, including the part resulting from the supplementary participation, are all assessed against the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the decision on retrial;

A. The Intervenor is a corporation that was established pursuant to C law and ordinarily employs more than 290 full time workers and carries out D development projects, etc.

On April 12, 2004, the plaintiff joined the intervenor corporation and worked for the intervenor corporation.

B. On October 29, 2013, the Intervenor held a personnel committee to conduct an interview with the E managing director, and the Plaintiff did not meet the requirements for the Secretary General of the F International School that “if the Plaintiff, as an E managing director, comprehensively employs the Secretary General of the F International School (af; hereinafter “instant international school”), including its wife G, has overall experience in establishing and conducting school affairs (such as personnel, budget, financing, etc.) in Korea and abroad,” but did not comply with the requirements for the Secretary General of the International School that “if the applicant fails to conduct an interview with the first executive officer, he/she did not comply with the requirement for the submission of documents, and did not comply with the requirement for the submission of documents.” However, the Intervenor’s act of failing to comply with the requirement for the submission of documents to the Plaintiff by reporting the type of documents for employment and the results of the interview with the two applicants and notifying the interested parties of the dismissal of the Plaintiff’s act in violation of Article 15(1) of the Act.”

(hereinafter “instant dismissal”). (c) The dismissal of the instant case

On November 6, 2013, the Plaintiff asserted that the instant dismissal constituted unfair dismissal, and filed an application for unfair dismissal with the Jeju Special Self-Governing Province Regional Labor Relations Commission, and the Jeju Special Self-Governing Province Regional Labor Relations Commission dismissed the Plaintiff’s application for remedy on February 14, 2014.

On February 24, 2014, the Plaintiff appealed to the above initial inquiry tribunal and applied for reexamination to the National Labor Relations Commission, and the National Labor Relations Commission on May 8, 2014.

arrow