Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 500,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won shall be one day.

Punishment of the crime

Around March 8, 2017, the Defendant publicly insultingd the victim by saying, “Around March 8, 2017, the Defendant took a cell phone to listen to the statement from the victim F, a police officer of the Mapo-gu Seoul Mapo-gu Police Station E District Police Station E District Police Officer, who is the victim F, who was called the victim F, who was called the victim of this case, and called, “It is necessary for the victim to have a money?” and the victim’s photographed 10 customers, including G and H, while there are 10 customers such as G and H, the Defendant told the victim publicly insulting the victim by saying, “It is necessary for the victim to have a money?”

Summary of Evidence

1. A witness I and each legal statement in G;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the complaint;

1. Relevant Article 311 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The defendant and his defense counsel asserted that Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Provisional Payment Order only resisted the police's duty and did not wish to do so like the facts of the crime.

However, according to the above evidence, the Defendant was at the time engaged in daily and sexual indecent conduct while drinking and drinking, and G was at the time engaged in sexual indecent conduct from Defendant’s daily conduct.

Although the above main agent only resisted against the employee and did not have any particular measure such as reporting to the investigation agency, Defendant J reported to the police to the effect that the employee was subject to the G Roter (Article 156 of the Criminal Act is limited to the act of reporting false facts to the public office or public official). When the police, such as the victim dispatched, listen to whether the victim committed sexual misconduct and the intention to report from G G G, the Defendant taken pictures of the G Do Do Do Do Ha without hearing the reporter’s statement, and then heard the reporter’s statement from the statement of G Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Y, and it is recognized that the victim who failed to do so took the pictures of the G Do Ha Ha Ha

The defendant;