1. C On September 3, 2015, the approval of the obligation against the Defendant as set out in the separate sheet made by C shall be revoked.

2...

1. Basic facts

A. A. The status of a party 1) D and E, the couple of which, around 1985, were married, L and E engaged in the clothing business with the trade name of E, E, “F,” and C are the children of D and E. The Plaintiff is the husband of D and E. The Plaintiff is the father of C, and the Defendant is the husband of H, the couple of D, and the husband of D. The Defendant was the husband of D. 2) with the trade name of “I.”

B. 1) On July 15, 2014, the Plaintiff and C filed a related lawsuit, etc.: (a) On July 15, 2014, C owned by C, J, 801 Dong 1301 (hereinafter “instant real estate”).

(3) On August 13, 2014, the Plaintiff filed a lawsuit seeking the delivery of the instant real estate and the return of unjust enrichment equivalent to the rent earned by occupying the instant real estate. On September 11, 2015, the Plaintiff filed a claim for the return of the amount agreed to be acquired by the Plaintiff in lieu of or in lieu of the payment of the said purchase price. On September 11, 2015, the Plaintiff and C rendered a judgment ordering the Plaintiff to perform part of the said obligations upon simultaneous performance (U District Court Decision 2014No206040, 20657, 20657). The Plaintiff and C filed an appeal against the foregoing judgment. The appellate court dismissed the Plaintiff’s claim on June 17, 2016, with the Plaintiff’s claim on the counterclaim from 004 to 206, 2006, 2007, 306, 306, 2007, 306, 2007, 2006, 306, 17.