beta
Text
1. The defendant shall be 230,325,010 won to the plaintiff A, 39,283,221 won to the plaintiff B, and 7,00,000 won to the plaintiff C and the above amount.
Reasons
1. Establishment of liability for damages;
(a) Facts of recognition;
- On July 11, 2014, Plaintiff B driven D 5 tons of cargo vehicles (hereinafter “victims”) around 08:44, and passed a d 5 tonstoluene in the Pacific City of Pacific Island, and driven a road on the side of the parallel of the parallel of the Daegu-do border in the Daegu-do.
- Military personnel E of the United States of America (hereinafter referred to as the “U.S.”) operated a F vehicle owned by the United States of America for the performance of their duties (hereinafter referred to as “A.S.”) and followed the damaged vehicle driven by the Plaintiff B to the four lanes at the road connected to the Gyeong Highway while entering the Gyeong Highway, but again, while the vehicle was changed to the three lanes, G driven in the 3 lanes of the U.S. would not see H 14 tons, which had been driven by the 3 lanes, and the front right side part of the Gac Vehicle was shocked by the Gac Vehicle, and the direction was changed from the 3 lanes to the 4 lanes of the Gac Vehicle, thereby causing an accident to cause the damaged vehicle to conflict with the damaged vehicle about changing the 4 lanes from the Gac Road to the right side.
- The plaintiff B, who had driven the damaged vehicle, suffered from injury such as brain dust, and the plaintiff A, who was on board, suffered from injury such as the right to the right, cutting of trees, etc., and the damaged vehicle was damaged to the extent that its repair cost is equivalent to KRW 39,359,479.
- The plaintiff B and A are married couple, and the plaintiff C are their children.
[Ground for Recognition: Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 17 (including a branch number)
(2) Each entry and the purport of the whole pleading
B. Determination E intends to change from the fourth line to the third line in operation, it first confirms whether there is no vehicle driven on the third line, and neglects this in spite of its duty to use direction direction direction, etc. and proceed safely.