1. From 10,00,000 to 10,000 won, the Defendant shall draw up a separate sheet among the real estate listed in the separate sheet from May 6, 2018.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. A. Around December 22, 2010, D entered into a lease agreement with the Defendant on the part (A) size 82.5 square meters (hereinafter “instant store”) in the attached Form No. 1, 2, 3, 4, and 1 among the real estate listed in the attached Table No. 4 (hereinafter “instant building”) owned by D, which connects each point of which is indicated in the attached Table No. 1, 2, 3, 4, and 1, with the Defendant. D entered into a lease agreement with the Defendant to lease the instant store at KRW 400,000 (6 prepaid on January 6, 201) with the monthly rent of KRW 10,000 (hereinafter “instant lease agreement”).

Around that time according to the instant lease agreement, D received KRW 10,000,000 from the Defendant as the lease deposit, and delivered the instant store to the Defendant.

B. On April 4, 2012, the registration of transfer of ownership in the name of E was completed on April 17, 2017 and the registration of transfer of ownership in the name of the Plaintiffs was completed on April 17, 2017 with shares of 1/2 shares.

C. On May 22, 2017, September 11, 2017, and October 20, 2017, the Plaintiffs sent to the Defendant a written document to the effect that “The instant lease contract was implicitly renewed several times, and the said lease term was extended until January 5, 2018, but there was no intention to renew it, and the said contract was terminated on January 5, 2018, and thus the delivery of the instant store was changed,” and each of the said written statements reached the Defendant around the date of delivery.

Under the instant lease agreement, the Defendant paid monthly rent to the Plaintiffs until April 2018, and the monthly rent from May 6, 2018 did not pay until August 30, 2018, which is the date of closing argument in the instant case.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, entry of Gap 1 to 4 evidence (including each number), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. On January 5, 2018, the Plaintiffs asserted by the parties, even though the instant lease agreement was terminated, the Defendant continued to hold the instant store.