Defendant shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be converted into one day.

Criminal facts

On September 22, 2012, around 00:50 on September 2, 2012, the Defendant driven a car with Cgallon, thereby driving a car at a speed of 70km from the nC department store to the 3-lane distance of municipal ordinance.

At the same time, the signal was cross-road at the front of that place, and the view was not good at night, so the defendant had a duty of care to reduce the speed and conduct the front line in good faith.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected this and found the ethotobane of the victim who was left left due to the negligence in violation of the signal in the opposite part of the signal, and delayed, but did not stop, and received the victim's right right side on the front side of the vehicle.

On September 22, 2012, the Defendant caused the death of the victim of occupational negligence by a low-blood shock shock that occurred in the net 221, 201, which had been under the follow-up treatment on September 22, 2012.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The actual condition survey report;

1. Investigation report (investigation of the signals at the time of the accident);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a death certificate;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning facts constituting an offense, Article 3 (1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents Aggravated Punishment, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, which caused a traffic accident by negligence by the defendant, causes the death of the victim. However, although the defendant repents and reflects his/her mistake, the defendant is the first offender, the victim operated the Oralone in violation of the signal, and the mistake seems to have caused the accident of this case, the vehicle of the defendant is covered by the comprehensive insurance.