A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal history] On May 4, 201, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 500,000 as a fine for larceny in the Southern Branch of the Gwangju District Court, on November 15, 201, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 500,000 as a fine for larceny, etc. on November 15, 201, and on October 2, 2013, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 700,00 as a fine for larceny from the Seoul District Court’s Branch Branch of the Gwangju District Court’s Mapoon on October 2, 2013.

[2] Around January 3, 2018, the Defendant: (a) committed soup to the 3th floor of D 3th floor located in Sinpo City C on January 3, 2018; and (b) committed a theft with one cell phone of approximately KRW 500,000,000 in the market price of the victim’s possession, which the victim E set up on the floor to charge for distribution.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. On-site photographs;

1. Criminal records as stated: Application of an inquiry letter, such as criminal history, investigation report (the same type of criminal records) and other Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 329 of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense and Article 329 of the choice of punishment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act for the observation of protection and observation [the scope of recommending punishment] There is no basic area (six months to one year and six months) [the person subject to special sentencing] of types 2 (general larceny] [decision of sentence] [the person subject to special sentencing] [the defendant has a record of being subject to criminal punishment three times for the same crime as in the judgment of the court below, and the defendant did not agree with the victim, but there is no record of criminal punishment other than the fine, and there is no record of criminal punishment other than the fine, confession and reflects the crime of this case, and it seems that the defendant did not have the intellectual ability of the defendant, and all of the sentencing factors indicated in the records shall be determined as the disposition