logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.11.23 2017고단6689
국토의계획및이용에관한법률위반등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who rents and uses the Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government 2166 square meters in the area where permission for development activities is restricted.

Any person who intends to engage in development activities, such as constructing buildings, installing structures, changing the form and quality of land, etc., shall obtain permission from the Special Metropolitan City Mayor, Metropolitan City Mayors, Metropolitan Autonomous City Mayors, Special Self-Governing Cities, Sis/Guns, or heads of Guns, and any person who intends to divert farmland shall obtain permission from

Nevertheless, the Defendant did not obtain permission for development activities and permission for diversion of farmland from the competent authority, from January 201 to May 2017, 2017, and 1,832.29 square meters out of the above farmland, sealed the said farmland, and newly constructed two plastic houses equivalent to 106.5 square meters in total floor area, and used them as parking lots, offices, storage, etc., respectively.

Accordingly, the Defendant performed development activities such as changing the form and quality of land and installing structures without obtaining permission for development activities and permission for diversion of farmland, and diverted farmland.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of a written accusation, an accusation report, a field photograph, a land ledger, a register, or a document confirming a land use plan;

1. Subparagraph 1 of Article 140 of the National Land Planning and Utilization Act and Article 56 (1) of the same Act concerning the facts constituting an offense; Articles 57 (2) and 34 (1) of the Farmland Act;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor as a matter of choice (such as: (a) a person who has been sentenced to three times a fine due to a violation of the Management of Mountainous Districts Act, a violation of the Management of Mountainous Districts Act, a violation of the Management of Mountainous Districts Act, a violation of the Management of Mountainous Districts Act, a violation of the Management of State Property Act, etc., and a violation of the Management of State Property Act, in the event that the

1. Article 62 of the Criminal Act:

arrow