Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a CTB car.

Around 04:40 on January 17, 2016, the Defendant: (a) driven the above vehicle, while driving the front part of the victim D (60 years old) driven by the victim D(60 years old) immediately preceding pursuant to the new subparagraph to the front part of the vehicle driving by the Defendant, while driving in violation of the signal, driving in the course of duty and driving in violation of the signal to the shooting distance of the Filiwon Park at the city of Suwon-gu, Young-gu, Young-gu, Sin-gu, Sin-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City.

Ultimately, the Defendant, by such occupational negligence, suffered injury to the victim D, such as catum catum, etc., requiring approximately 2 weeks of medical treatment, injury to the victim F (21) who was on board the damaged vehicle, such as brain satis, etc., requiring approximately 2 weeks of medical treatment, and injury to the victim G (22 tax) who was on board the damaged vehicle, including catum catum and tensions requiring approximately 2 weeks of medical treatment, and injury to the victim H (45 years of age) who was on board the Defendant’s driving vehicle, including spine catum damage requiring approximately 14 weeks of medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. The statement of the witness H;

1. Written statements related to D traffic accidents;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each written diagnosis;

1. Article 3 (1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of a credit cooperative without prison labor for punishment;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Code of the suspended sentence [the scope of the recommended sentence] does not apply to regular concurrent crimes.

[Determination of sentence] The defendant reflects the defendant, the victim H's diagnostic period for the injury is long, and the degree of the injury is not less severe, but it is difficult to regard it as serious injury, the vehicle comprehensive insurance is subscribed, the violation of the special law of the teaching sector is subject to a fine of one time in 2001, and there is no criminal record of the same kind.