logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 2018.10.16 2018나51178
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

purport.

Reasons

1. The scope of the trial at this court asserted that: (a) the Defendant’s act of defamation from October 27, 2013 to November 29, 2013 (Sacheon District Court Decision 2014Ma644); (b) the Defendant, on behalf of the Defendant, on his behalf of Nonparty C and five other, suffered emotional distress due to the act of fraud, etc.; and (c) the Defendant sought compensation for consolation money (10 million won) and its delayed payment based on tort liability.

The first instance judgment accepted the request once, and ② the claim was dismissed.

Accordingly, since only the defendant appealed against the defendant among the judgment of the court of first instance, the scope of the judgment of this court is limited to the part of the defendant's appeal No. 1.

2. Presumed factual basis

A. The Plaintiff operated real estate brokerage business under the trade name of “E Licensed Real Estate Agent Office” at the D apartment Docheon-si, Chuncheon, and the Defendant served as a broker assistant at the above brokerage establishment from March 2012 to September 2013.

B. On September 25, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of KRW 3 million for violating the Act on Promotion of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection (Defamation) due to the following criminal facts.

(A) On October 27, 2013, the Defendant and Defendant F conspiredd to use false resident numbers created by creating Internet resident registration numbers on the HPC bank located in Hongcheon-gun, Seocheon-gun, Seocheon-gun, Seocheon-gun, Seocheon-gun, Seocheon-gun, Seocheon-gun, Seocheon-gu, Gyeongcheon-do, and Kocheon-do, to make IDJJ (IDJ) and access to KK, to the effect that, on October 27, 2013, the Defendant and Defendant F conspired to make an investment in P, with real estate NC character in the MT, and to make an investment in P, with OC character, and to make a loan contract for the purpose of slandering the Plaintiff. It does not cause considerable damage to the Plaintiff F.

arrow