1. Defendant A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,00,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine.

Punishment of the crime

1. On July 3, 2015, Defendant A around 23:50, at the first floor of the D Building in Changwon-si, Changwon-si, Masiwon-si, Defendant A: (a) calculated the drinking value on the second floor of the same building; (b) calculated the drinking value on the E main shop located on the second floor of the same building; (c) completed a calculation that would cover the additional dues on the part of the victim F, who is an employee; (d) followed the emergency lights from the stairs on the second floor; (e) cut off the stairs of the first floor into the entrance of the first floor; and (e) displayed the e main signboard attached to the wall several times as drinking.

Defendant

A, as above, damaged the E main signboard that is managed by the injured party, the repair cost of KRW 400,000.

2. Defendant B, at around 00:09 on July 4, 2015, demanded Defendant B to Defendant B, who was the first executive officer of the Msan-dong Police Station G District of the Msan-dong Police Station, and called Defendant B to state the situation at the time according to the near G district nearest to the suspicion of damage to the property as described in paragraph (1). Defendant B, who was sent to Defendant B upon receipt of a report at the place as described in paragraph (1) around 00:09, instructed Defendant B, who was the first executive officer of the Msan-dong Police Station of the Msan-dong Police Station, to ask Defendant B to state the situation at the time. Defendant B, who was dissatisfied with this demand, and assaulted Defendant B by drinking h’s flab with his left hand.

Defendant

B interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reports.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each statement made to the police with respect to F and H;

1. Application of the written estimate statutes;

1. Relevant Article of the Act and the choice of punishment for the crime;

(a) Defendant A: Article 366 of the Criminal Act (Selection of a punishment penalty);

B. Defendant B: Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (the choice of imprisonment)

1. Defendant A to be detained in a workhouse: Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendant B of the suspended execution: Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (the fact that his mistake and reflects his depth, the fact that there is no same kind of force, the fact that there is no record of suspended execution or higher, and the fact that he does not again commit a crime interfering with the execution of official duties;

(3) such consideration as the