1. The part concerning the claim for restoration among the lawsuits in this case shall be dismissed.

2. The defendant shall be the plaintiff.

(a) the annexed list;

1. We examine, ex officio, as to the legitimacy of the part requesting restoration of the lawsuit of this case, whether the part requesting restoration of the original state is legitimate or not.

In civil procedure, the purport of the claim should be specified in detail so that the contents and scope can be clearly identified.

However, in the case of a claim for restoration among the lawsuits in this case, the contents and scope of the claim cannot be deemed clearly specified because the subject, scope, content, method, etc. of restoration are not specified.

Therefore, among the lawsuits of this case, the claim for restoration of the original state is unlawful because the claim is not clearly specified.

2. The description of the grounds for the claim shall be as specified in the attached Form;

3. Article 208 (3) 3 of the Civil Procedure Act applicable provisions of Acts.