1. All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Defendants.

Purport of claim and appeal

1.

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as follows, in addition to adding the judgment as to this case's defense in relation to the assertion to supplement or add the defendants in the trial, and evidence related thereto, it is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, it is also cited in this case's summary under the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. Additional matters to be determined;

A. The Defendants have the right to represent AC’s representative, among the members attending the meeting minutes of the general meeting held on November 25, 2009, who elected AC’s representative, there are non-qualified members, non-standing members, and family members whose signatures are overlapped. The amendment of Article 9(1) and Article 9(1) and Article 9(9) that extends the term of office from 2 years to 3 years at the above general meeting is null and void without prior deliberation by the board of directors. If the Defendants were to elect AC’ representative at the above general meeting, the Defendants did not have to have improved the officer’s status at the general meeting of 2 years following the previous termination of the term of office of executive officers at the general meeting of 201, and there was no legitimate resolution for replacement of executive officers at the general meeting and AC’s reappointment on November 23, 2012 without any legitimate resolution for replacement of executive officers at the general meeting’s general meeting’s general meeting’s general meeting’s general meeting’s general meeting’s general meeting’s general meeting’s general meeting’s general meeting’s general meeting’s general meeting’s general meeting’s general meeting’s general meeting’s general meeting’s general meeting’s general meeting’s general meeting’s general meeting’s general meeting’s general meeting’s general meeting’s non.

On November 25, 2009, some (BC and BD) of the participants at the ordinary meeting of the ordinary shareholders of November 25, 2009, such as double signature, are deemed to have been somewhat erroneous in the minutes.