logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 2016.05.17 2016고단159
컴퓨터등사용사기
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Domestic mobile game companies] The mobile game companies registered a game on the smartphone fluor (former e-mail fluor) provided by the U.S. language companies (former e-mail fluor) and let domestic and foreign users get off the game in the above fluor. If pay items (on-line, credit card, etc.) are settled through the old writing company's settlement system linked to the game, it is the structure that the item is immediately paid to the user's account.

In the case of mobile phones that are operated by the up-to-face operating system, it is possible to use the Gu language account only when the user registers the Gu language account, it is possible to use it by registering a new Gu language account at the user's option, and there is no limit to the frequency of registration.

[The former Ordinance on the Purchase and Exchange of Apps Doogle ] The former Ordinance recommends the developer to directly ask the developer if he/she wishes to purchase additional contents (a item, online money, etc.) or to cancel payment (return, etc.) within the game (the purchase of apps Doogle 1, 200, and 48 hours, if the contact with the developer is difficult to contact with the developer, he/she will notify the result by e-mail only once after reviewing whether refund is possible).

The cancellation of settlement is a case where a request is made by linking the old text account registered with the mobile phone, or a request is made by posting a telephone directly to the customer center in the old text.

[ criminal facts] The defendant, who received an item from a person who acquired it in the game, requested the cancellation of the purchase (payment) of the item in the mobile game, then the settlement is revoked, and the item paid may be used. The defendant knew of the fact and thought to acquire property benefits equivalent to the price revoked by using the item.

On July 3, 2014, the Defendant, at around 10:21 on July 3, 201, on the game, “blodds” installed in his cell phone (C) at the Defendant’s residence located in Chuncheon City, B, etc. (hereinafter “Blods”).

arrow