1. Defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

Seized evidence No. 3 shall be confiscated from Defendant A.

2...

Punishment of the crime

The Defendants conspired to commit so-called “scaming” fraud with the so-called “scambling” (one-called “D”), and shared the roles of the Defendants in charge of the crime, such as demanding the victims to transfer or directly bring about money to a specific account on account of the need for criminal investigation by misrepresenting the public prosecutor or the staff of the public prosecutor’s office by telephoneing the victims, and demanding them to use a specific account. Defendant A shared the roles of the “solicitation” to take charge of the management of the victims to withdraw the money transferred by the victims, or to collect and manage the victims by receiving the money transferred by the victims, and Defendant B, according to the direction of the victims with no name.

On March 29, 2018, according to the above public invitation, the person infinite is under investigation by misrepresenting the investigator or prosecutor belonging to the Chuncheon District Public Prosecutor's Office by posting a phone to the victim E at a non-finite District Public Prosecutor's Office on March 29, 2018, and committing fraud using the account opened in the name of the party.

A false statement is made to the effect that all of the money deposited in the above account is withdrawn, and the password is stored in the G department store in the original city F, and the employee of the Financial Supervisory Service would receive it if he/she discloses it, and that he/she will return money after completion of the necessary investigation. Accordingly, the victim withdraws 500,000 won from the company bank account and made the victim store it in the above goods at around 15:30 on the same day.

After that, Defendant A instructed Defendant B to take full account of his name and in accordance with the direction of Defendant B, Dongdaemun-gu Seoul, Dongdaemun-gu I, to bring about the said cash, and Defendant B was able to take up the said cash at the above place around 21:05 on the same day, in accordance with the said order.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to deceive the victim, thereby deceiving the victim in cash.