1. All appeals filed by the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant).

3...

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is as follows, with the exception of partial revision.

Therefore, it is accepted in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

The 3rd 10 parallel " April 1, 2012" shall be changed to " July 2, 2012".

3. The last letter-based "marketing company" in the 3th page shall be changed to "sales company".

The 5th page "E" shall be raised to "C".

The 6th page "T" in the 8th page shall be raised to "publication".

7. The "24" of the 7th parallel shall be changed to "24 through 27".

Each "Witness" of the 7th parallel 8th parallel 15th parallel 16th parallel 16th parallel 199.

From 9, 14 to 11, 3 pages are as follows:

1) As to the counterclaim of Defendant C, the Plaintiff asserted that the counterclaim of this case is unlawful, since Defendant C had no capacity to do so, only H had the capacity to do so, and Defendant C had no capacity to do so, despite having no capacity to do so. Defendant C corrected the indication of the party at the first instance trial to Defendant C. Defendant C had no capacity to do so. Defendant C was represented by the representative, and Defendant C was not a representative. Thus, the counterclaim of this case is unlawful.

2) Since a party’s authorization in a lawsuit is an important matter directly related to the party’s ability, standing as a party, etc., the court which examines and determines the case must ex officio confirm who the party to the lawsuit and proceed with the hearing. In such a case, the court shall reasonably interpret and confirm the whole purport of the complaint, including the details of and the cause for the indication and the claim recorded in the complaint (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decisions 9Du2017, Nov. 13, 2001; 2010Da99040, Mar. 10, 2011). If the Plaintiff did not accurately indicate the party’s ability or the party’s standing and did not indicate it as a party, the court shall have jurisdiction over the party’s complaint.