Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

1. On November 15, 2012, around 22:10 on November 15, 2012, the Defendant: (a) opened a door in the front of the “E” restaurant located in Seocho-gu Seoul Seocho-gu Seoul, to board a F car, which has been driven by himself/herself, and (b) became an operator of the said HW sport car, who is a driver of the said HW sport car, by contact with the victim G (owner) who was parked by the door.

The Defendant opened a car door on several occasions with the appearance of “I who resisted that the car is defective” as “I have to grow up on the same day as that which has not been able to grow.”

After close, the parts of the benz's driver's seat of the car were intentionally destroyed by destroying the repair cost of KRW 2,563,00.

2. The Defendant assaulted the victim I on the ground that the Defendant told the Defendant of the destruction of the destructive action described in paragraph 1 at the time, place, and the destructive action described in paragraph 1, by putting the victim I into his hands at one time on the floor of the victim I (Nam, 34 years old).

3. In the case where 15 persons, who are police officers belonging to the Seocho Police Station J District Police Agency, who arrive at the scene after receiving a report on the date, time, place, and assault and damage of property as stated in paragraph (1), are in large numbers of 15 persons, such as parking managers L, I, and Defendant’s daily sailing M, the Defendant publicly insultingd the victim K by taking a bath, such as “the level of nicking sound,” and “the level of nicks,” and “the level of nicks,” etc.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of the witness K, I and L;

1. A report on investigation, the amount of damage caused by vehicle damage, and a written estimate for repair;

1. Photographs damaged vehicles;

1. The application of laws and regulations to the following inquiry details (as the K, I's investigative agencies and court statements are consistent, specific, and consistent with each other. Comprehensively considering only each evidence described in the summary of the evidence, the defendant's act in the facts charged is judged to have been proven to the extent that there is no reasonable doubt.).

1. Article 366 of the Criminal Act, Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act, Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act, and the Criminal Act concerning the crime;