[Defendant A] Defendant A’s imprisonment with prison labor for each of the crimes set forth in the second sentence of 2016, second sentence of 4643, second sentence of 2017, second sentence of 2007, respectively.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant A was sentenced to 8 months of imprisonment for fraud at the Daegu District Court on December 13, 2013 and 2 years of suspended execution, and the judgment became final and conclusive on December 21, 2013. On July 15, 2016, the Daegu District Court sentenced Defendant A to 4 years of imprisonment, and the judgment became final and conclusive on January 25, 2017, and Defendant B was sentenced to 4 months of imprisonment for fraud at the Incheon District Court on September 9, 2016 and became final and conclusive on November 14, 2016.

On February 24, 2011, Defendant A made a false statement to the effect that “Around February 24, 2016, at the second floor office of the building near the building F in Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, as the president of the (ju) G, Defendant A may order the victim H to remove the I apartment at the North Korean port, Gyeong-gu, Gyeong-gu, Gyeong-gu, Gyeong-do, and the money will be repaid by May 30, 201.”

However, since the above redevelopment project does not proceed due to the absence of the selection of the contractor at the time of fact, the defendant did not have the intent or ability to receive the removal construction or to repay it by the due date, even if he borrowed the above money.

Nevertheless, the Defendant had, as above, delivered to the injured party a copy of the check at the face value of KRW 10 million and a copy of the check at the face value of KRW 20 million.

Defendant A, 2007, the 2017 Highest 2007, misrepresenting the president of the J (hereinafter “J”) and Defendant B, the J director or the president of the Gyeonggi branch of the K (hereinafter “K”), and, if the subcontracted works are ordered in K, he/she voluntarily planned to prepare a contract under the name of the JJ of the Construction Business Chain and to receive a fee in return.

1. On April 2013, Defendant A obtained a proposal from Defendant B to use the name of J when entering into a subcontract for construction works related to the construction works of L and Asan-si Office Mtel, and Defendant B consented without authority. Defendant B, at around that time, was inserted in his office located within the NO of the Non-Yancheon-gu NO of the Non-Sacheon-gu Office.