logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2015.06.26 2014가단10567
손해배상(기)
Text

1. Defendant E: (a) KRW 28,173,563; (b) KRW 1,00,000; and (c) KRW 1,00,000 for each said money to Plaintiff A; and (b) from February 2, 2014 to February 2, 2015.

Reasons

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

(a) The facts subsequent to the facts of the recognition do not conflict between the parties, or can be recognized in full view of Gap evidence Nos. 1 to 4 (including each number, if the number is indicated; hereinafter the same shall apply), Eul evidence Nos. 3, the fact inquiry results with respect to the head of the Jinhae Gu of this Court, and the whole purport of the oral argument, and there is no counter-proof.

1) At around 19:00 on February 1, 2014, the deceased F am together with Defendant C, D, etc. at the “H” drinking house located in Seocho-gu, Changwon-si, J. A, the Plaintiff heard that “the net F is deemed to have a water drinking.” On February 1, 2014, the deceased F am together with the “J” house located in Changwon-gu, J. 2, 2014. (2) on February 23:40, 2014, the deceased F ambling the Plaintiff’s face to A, including Plaintiff A and B, upon reporting the Plaintiff’s assault at K in the vicinity of the “J” house located in Changjin-gu, Changwon-si, Y-si, and walking over the Plaintiff’s face, including Plaintiff A and B, to the Plaintiff’s face.

3) As a result, Plaintiff A suffered internal breath of the ewal part of the ewal part of the ewal part that requires medical treatment for 35 days, hiverosis, hiverosis, and hiversary hivershosis, etc., and 28 days. 4) The net F was investigated by the police on March 19, 2014, and committed suicide with the issue of criminal agreement and personal debt.

5) According to the facts of recognition as above, Defendant E is the mother of the network F, and Plaintiff B is the mother of Plaintiff A. b. 1, it is reasonable to deem that Plaintiff A suffered property and mental injury due to the networkF’s above injury, etc., and Plaintiff B may also be ratified in light of the empirical rule that Plaintiff A suffered mental damage by causing injury to Plaintiff A, who is an infant.

Therefore, Defendant E, who succeeded to the network F, shall compensate the Plaintiff A for property, mental damage, and mental damage, except in extenuating circumstances.

arrow