Text
The prosecution of this case is dismissed.
Reasons
1. The summary of the facts charged is that the Defendant, who runs a publishing business with the trade name of C, did not have a legitimate title to reproduce the books with author’s property right, but did not have a legitimate title to possess the victim’s book “E” film and copy the victim’s book to illegally reproduce and sell it.
From the end of 2009 to the beginning of 2010 and from the end of 2010 to the beginning of 2011, the Defendant infringed on the Defendant’s property rights by reproducing 15,00 copies of “E” and 10,000 copies of “E”, which are the learning teaching materials for children, through the G printing office located in Yongsan-gu, Yongsan-gu, Busan-si, without the victim’s permission.
2. Applicable provisions to the facts charged in judgment: Judgment dismissing a complaint by the victim on September 4, 2015, which is after the prosecution under the main sentence of Article 140 of the Copyright Act, is instituted (Article 327 subparagraph 5 of the Criminal Procedure Act).