logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 제주지방법원 2017.06.09 2014고단1573
영유아보육법위반등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who operates a “D Child Care Center” in Jeju City.

The founder or operator of a child-care center shall not collect child-care fees, etc. by fraud or other improper means, and the special activity expenses shall be used for personnel expenses of special activity instructors, the teaching materials for special activities, and the purchase expenses of school districts in accordance with the guidelines for the "Guidance for Infant Care Services" of each year publication by the Health and Welfare Ministry, and the details thereof shall be reported to the Child-care Center Steering Committee or notified to the guardian by settling the amount received by each guardian, the amount used,

On February 2, 2010, when the defendant takes a special English class to the guardians of the victimized child in the child care center, the defendant should pay 32,500 won per capita special activity expenses.

However, the Defendant was scheduled to recover part of the special activity expenses paid to the “E Institute”, a special activity entity, from the “E Institute” and use them for other purposes.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, without settling the special activity expenses as above, did not notify the guardians of infant care of the fact that the Defendant would receive and use part of the special activity expenses from the special activity company, and received 32,500 won from the guardians of infant care children as special activity expenses on March 26, 2010, and received 14,500 won out of the amount from the “EN” as special activity expenses from the guardians of infant care children, from the time on February 2012, the Defendant received 8,871,045 won in total by the same method as in the attached list of crimes from February 2, 2012, and acquired property benefits by deceiving the victims in excess of the above amount.

Summary of Evidence

1. Entry of each part of the defendant in the first and fifth public trial records;

1. Statement made by the witness G in the fifth public trial records;

1. The police of H. H.

arrow