1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

On December 23, 2015, the Defendant posted a letter containing the content that “The Plaintiff expressed to the Defendant “C” on the NAV bulletin stating that “The Plaintiff would be able to take a more dial-a-a-a-the-job license,” and “a good woman must take a child,” and that “the Plaintiff would have taken a more dial-a-the-job license.” There is no dispute between the parties.

The plaintiff asserts that he damaged the plaintiff's reputation by stating false facts, and sought compensation for consolation money of KRW 20 million and delay damages therefor.

First of all, as to whether false facts were stated in the above article posted by the Defendant, the evidence submitted by the Plaintiff is difficult to recognize it, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.

Furthermore, even if some of the contents that may prejudice the plaintiff's social reputation are included in the above article, circumstances revealed by Gap's evidence Nos. 1 through 3, Eul evidence Nos. 1 and 2 and the purport of the whole arguments and arguments, namely, the defendant appears to have posted the above article to correct the facts upon the plaintiff's demand for explanation of the facts, and the above article consists of the facts experienced by the defendant, rather than the plaintiff's evaluation against the plaintiff, and is made in the form of explanation against the questions raised by the carpets, it is difficult to view that the defendant's posting of the above article intentionally intended to damage the plaintiff's reputation and constitutes a tort.

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim shall be dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.