A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

Punishment of the crime

1. On July 14, 2011, the Defendant committed the crime of July 14, 2011, concluded a false statement to the effect that “If only 40 million won is lent to the victim E at the D parking lot located in Osan-si, Osan-si, the Defendant will pay interest on three parts per month and pay it without a mold after six months.”

However, apartment owned by the Defendant has no particular economic value because of the establishment of the right to collateral security with the maximum debt amount of KRW 120 million due to the loan of a financial institution, and the Defendant is also liable for the total amount of KRW 130 million in addition to the financial institution. The income amount of KRW 150 through 2 million in each month is insufficient to be used for the cost of living. A part of the amount borrowed from the victim is used for the debt repayment and living expenses, and the remainder was considered to be used for the share investment, but there was a situation in which the victim reported enormous loss due to the existing share investment, and even if there was no specific property, it was no intention or ability to repay it on the agreed date.

As can be seen, the Defendant was transferred KRW 40 million from the victim to the bank account (F) in the name of the Defendant on the same day.

2. On July 18, 2012, the Defendant committed the crime of July 18, 2012, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “When the Defendant borrowed 200 million won from the H apartment complex located in Osan-si G where the victim is living, she will pay 240 million won in the same place as the sum of 40 million won borrowed at a low time, the sum of 200 million won shall be paid. The Defendant would be able to provide the apartment house as security in the name of his father and the joint name even in Incheon, while he owned the apartment house in the future of 121 Dong 1503, 1503, I apartment in Osan-si, and even in Incheon, he/she owns the apartment house in the name of his/her father and the joint name and provided it as

However, in fact, the above I apartment owned by the defendant did not have any value as a security, such as the above I apartment, and the defendant did not own apartment in Incheon, and the amount borrowed from the victim is 15.5.5.