The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (including six months of imprisonment without prison labor and two years of suspended execution) declared by the court below is too unfasible.

2. The crime of this case is deemed to have been committed by the defendant, who was negligent in neglecting the duty of care on the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the duty of care in the child protection area, resulting in serious injury to the victim, who is a woman of 11 years old age old, by neglecting the duty of care on the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the duty of care for about 10 weeks. The crime of this case is not easy to be committed by the defendant, but against the defendant's mistake while the defendant acknowledged the crime of this case with no previous criminal record. The defendant's vehicle is covered by a comprehensive insurance, and the defendant deposits 1,00,000 won at the court below for the victim. The defendant additionally deposited 2,00,000 won for the victim's growth disorder or alteration symptoms until now, and the victim's the body part of the victim's movement is almost close to the situation of the victim's movement, and the defendant's family relation and the circumstances of this case are not justified.

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.