1. The defendant shall be punished by a fine of three hundred thousand won;

2. 50,000 won where the defendant does not pay the above fine.

Punishment of the crime

The victim C is the head of the management office of the DNA apartment in Namyang-si, Namyang-si, and the defendant is an English instructor who has become aware of the victim by attaching a learning guidance paper to the above apartment complex.

1. 2011. 11. 11.자 모욕 2011. 11. 11. 11:40경 위 아파트 관리사무소에서 피고인이 광고 전단지에 접수도장을 시끄럽게 찍자 이에 대해 피해자가 “광고비를 돌려줄 테니 광고하지 마라.”고 하였다는 이유로 말다툼을 하다가 직원 E 등이 있는 자리에서 피해자에게 “내가 잡상인이냐 텃세를 부리느냐 소문이 안 좋고 못되게 났는데 맞네. 정말 그러네. 미친년아.”라고 큰 소리로 말하여 공연히 피해자를 모욕하였다.

2. Around 16:00 of November 17, 201, insultd on November 17, 2011, when demanding refund of the remainder of the expenses except for one week installation expenses in the advertisement leaflet at the same place, and where employees E, etc. are located, theme, governance, and governance of the head of the management office. The head of the management office is not identical to theme of the head of the management office. The staff of the management office is different from this pattern. The staff of this position is different from this pattern. The year of the opening, the year of the conclusion of the contract, and the year of the contract, whichever is human beings.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness C, E, and F;

1. Application of CD-related Acts and subordinate statutes

1. Article 311 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Determination on the assertion of the defendant and his/her defense counsel under Articles 70 and 69(2) of the Criminal Act for the confinement of the workhouse

1. The assertion;

A. In relation to the insult of the Defendant on November 11, 2011, there is no fact that the Defendant, on the date of this part of the charges, expressed the victim’s desire to “child” on the date of the charge.

B. In relation to insult on November 17, 201, even though the defendant expressed his desire on the date of this part of the facts charged, the apartment complex is complex.